Legal Opinion

Schuler Et Ux. v. Humphrey Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1953PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for the rescission of a contract for the sale and purchase of approximately 400 acres of land, with livestock and equipment, located in Douglas county, Oregon, brought by William A. Schuler and Cecelia Schuler, his wife, as plaintiffs, against Carlyle H. Humphrey and Gladys E. Humphrey, his wife, as defendants. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ right to rescind and entered a decree in favor of defendants for a strict foreclosure of the contract. Plaintiffs appeal.

On or about March 30, 1947, at Los Angeles, California, the plaintiffs and defendants entered into a written…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Dahl v. Crain Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Weiss and Hamilton v. GumbertOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ward v. JensonOregon Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Miller v. BoegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API