Legal Opinion

Weiss and Hamilton v. Gumbert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1951PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by plaintiffs David M. Weiss and Ed Hamilton against defendant Eva B. Gumbert, individually and as executrix of the estate of Milton L. Gumbert, deceased, to recover the sum of $10,000. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment were entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.

Milton L. Gumbert, in his lifetime, was the owner and operator of a retail fur business in Portland under the name of “Milton L. Gumbert Furriers” and of another retail fur business in Vancouver, Washington. He died…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Barbre v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Anderson v. LawsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Pennick v. American National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Schuler Et Ux. v. Humphrey Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Dahl v. Crain Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API