Legal Opinion
Bodenhamer v. Patterson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1977No. 74-931, SC 24464PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
Bodenhamers, the vendors, brought this suit to foreclose a land sale contract. Pattersons, the purchasers, counterclaimed for rescission and prayed for the return of their down payment and closing costs and for reimbursement for expenses incurred in attempting to construct a road. The trial court granted the rescission, but denied recovery for the road construction expenses. Pattersons appealed from this denial of financial relief, and Bodenhamers cross-appealed from the decree of rescission and denial of foreclosure. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).
The property in question is located near…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Wilkinson v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Miller Et Ux. v. Protrka Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Meade v. Cedarapids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Caldwell v. Pop's Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Handy v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Head & Seemann, Inc. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.