Legal Opinion

Lanners v. Whitney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1967PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRedding-, J.

(Pro Tempore).

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decree dismissing their suit to rescind a contract for the purchase by plaintiffs of a Beechcraft Bonanza airplane.

Plaintiffs, George R. Lanners and Alice M. Lanners, husband and wife, are residents of Portland, Oregon. George R. Lanners is engaged in the insurance business. The defendant is the owner and operator of the Newberg Sportsman Airpark and is engaged in the business of selling new and used airplanes.

While Alice M. Lanners is named as a party plaintiff, it would appear from the record that she did not participate in any manner…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Weiss and Hamilton v. GumbertOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Koehler v. DennisonOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Furtado v. GemmellOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hayden v. CollinsUtah Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Frank's Maintenance & Engineering, Inc. v. C. A. Rorerts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Jones v. AbrianiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API