Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schmitt v. Hoffmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1951No. 35,472PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chibe Justice.

Order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue from this court commanding the clerk of the district court for Scott county to transfer to Eamsey county the files in a proceeding instituted in Scott county by Peter J. Schmitt *187and others against M. J. Hoffmann, state commissioner of highways.

Peter J. Schmitt and other landowners, referred to above as petitioners, applied to the district court for Scott county for an alternative writ of mandamus commanding the commissioner of highways to take appropriate action to bring about condemnation proceedings…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Flowers v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. SDDS, Inc. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. SDDS, Inc. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Schmitt v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. State Highway Commission v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API