Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1899No. Nos. 11,742—(232)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Application, by order to show cause, for a writ of peremptory mandamus requiring the district court for Meeker county, the Honorable Gorham Powers and the Honorable Gauthe E. Qvale, the judges of said court, and the clerk thereof, to transfer all the papers and flies in the case of Peter E. Larson against Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Company to the district court for Hennepin county.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

This is an application, by order to show cause, for a peremptory *303writ of mandamus, requiring the district court of the county of Meeker, and the judges and clerk thereof, to transfer all of the papers and files in the case of Peter E. Larson against the Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Company, originally commenced in the district court of Meeker county, to the district court of the county of Hennepin.

The respondents make -the preliminary objection that the order which they are called upon to answer is not an order to show cause why a peremptory mandamus should not issue as provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flowers v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Carpenter v. ComfortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Prall v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Barrett v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Sheehan v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State ex rel. Ballord-Trimble Lumber Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API