Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Schmitt v. Hoffmann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 9, 1951No. 35,472Published
1Opinion of the Court
233 Minn. 186 (1951)
STATE EX REL. PETER J. SCHMITT AND OTHERS
v.
M.J. HOFFMANN.[1]
No. 35,472.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
February 9, 1951.
J.A.A. Burnquist, Attorney General, Arthur Christofferson, Deputy Attorney General, and Bert McMullen and John H. Rheinberger, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for relator.
Kleve J. Flakne, Ray G. Moonan, and Lewis E. Lohmann, for original petitioners and respondent Joseph J. Moriarty.
LORING, CHIEF JUSTICE.
Order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue from this court commanding the clerk of the district court for Scott county to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Flowers v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.