Flowers v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Charles Kittleson from an order of the district court for Le Sueur county, Oadwell, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The Gilbert Grain Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state. This action is brought by a number of its creditors against it and its officers and directors, under G. S. 1894, § 2600, subd. 3, to recover the amount of plaintiffs’ claims from such officers and directors on the ground that they have been guilty of fraud, unfaithfulness, and dishonesty in the discharge of their official duties.
The action was commenced in Le Sueur county, where none of the defendants resided, and more than a majority of them joined in a demand for a change of the place of trial to Hennepin…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Norris v. District Court First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- National New Haven Bank v. Northwestern Guaranty Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Merchants' Nat. Bank v. Northwestern Mfg. & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by17 opinions
- McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Casserly v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- First Nat. Bank v. WeidenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.