Legal Opinion
State, by Peterson v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 1, 1945No. 33,922PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magnet, Justice.
In 1935 and 1936, the state, pursuant to L. 1935, c. 51, and Ex. Sess. L. 1935-1936, c. 101, instituted two separate proceedings in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle counties, respectively, for the purpose of condemning land for use in the conservation of natural resources of the state and, particularly, for the purposes of flood control and restoration of lakes. The proceeding in Big Stone county Avas in connection with two WPA projects for the artificial diversion of Whetstone River into Big Stone Lake and the impounding of such waters by the erection of a dam, numerous dikes, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Road Department v. TharpSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Hardy v. SimpsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Riggs v. State Road CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- Curtis & Hill Gravel & Sand Co. v. State Highway CommissionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- State v. Prow's Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.