Hurning v. Hurning
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action for divorce in tbe district court for Fillmore county. The case was tried before Kingsley, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtOolrins, J.
Action for a divorce by the wife against the husband, commenced March 4, 1899, in the district court of the county of Fillmore. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was, and had been for more than one year then last past, a resident of the county of Fillmore; that the defendant was a resident of the county of Olmsted; and that the defendant wilfully deserted the plaintiff for the term of one year next before the filing of the complaint. Another ground for a divorce — cruel and inhuman treatment — was also alleged, but the allegations of the complaint in this respect are here immaterial,…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Floberg v. FlobergIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Zeiler v. ZeilerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- State ex rel. Hagan v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Easter v. EasterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Ewing v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.