Legal Opinion

Continental Telephone Co. of Oklahoma v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1979No. 52582PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*668DOOLIN, Justice:

Continental Telephone Company (the utility) was sued by twenty plaintiffs, individually and collectively for their own benefit as well as for the benefit of all other persons similarly situated. Plaintiffs are patrons or subscribers to telephone service in the Jones-Choctaw Exchange in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Plaintiff’s suit was filed in the District Court of Oklahoma County and sought $207,774.001 in damages for interrupted service on breach of contract. The petition alleged breach of contract in the following particulars: (1) failure to install proper equipment, (2)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Application of Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Powell v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Monson v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Wilson v. HarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Consumers Guild of America, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Fent v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API