Legal Opinion

Morrow v. BELL TELE. CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1984No. 292PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Charles S. Morrow filed two civil actions against The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (hereinafter “Bell”). The complaint in one action was in equity and sought class action certification; the complaint in the other action claimed individual damages for tortious and/or contractual wrongs allegedly committed upon Morrow by Bell. Bell filed preliminary objections to both complaints. In the equity action, the court concluded that subject matter jurisdiction was vested exclusively in the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. Therefore, it dismissed the action. A similar…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Behrend v. Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Industria Cortinera, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
  3. Danko Development Corp. v. Econocast Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Winterhalter v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Pettko v. Pennsylvania American Water Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API