Calik v. Superior Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

¶ 1 In 1996, Arizona voters adopted Proposition 200, thereby effecting changes to Arizona’s drug laws. David Peter Calik (“Calik”) argues that Proposition 200 prohibits the trial court from imposing incarceration in jail as a condition of his probation following his conviction for a first offense of possession of methamphetamine. We hold that Proposition 200 does not preclude the trial court from imposing incarceration in jail as a condition of Calik’s probation. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On June 20, 1997, Calik, who had no prior criminal history, pled guilty to…