Janson v. Christensen
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CORCORAN, Justice.
Pursuant to rule 27(a), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona has certified to this court the following question of law:
Does A.R.S. § 12-504, commonly referred to as Arizona’s saving statute, apply to the refiling of an action after the statute of limitations has expired, when the original action was terminated before the expiration of the limitations period?
Because this question is an issue of first impression in this state and could be determinative of the action before the district court, we accept jurisdiction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.