Raney v. Lindberg
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 This special action presents two issues for our consideration:
1. Does Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01(F) (2001) apply when the state has not formally alleged a conviction and when the plea agreement includes no reference to it?
2. Does the offense of solicitation of possession of a dangerous drug constitute a previous conviction pursuant to § 13-901.01(F)?
We answer both questions in the affirmative. 1 In answering the first question, we follow Bolton v. Superior Court, 190 Ariz. 201, 945 P.2d 1332 (App.1997) and distinguish State v. Hensley, 201…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State of Arizona v. David Lee GreenArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- O'CONNOR v. HyattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.