Legal Opinion

Raney v. Lindberg

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 2003No. 1 CA-SA 02-0270PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 This special action presents two issues for our consideration:

1. Does Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01(F) (2001) apply when the state has not formally alleged a conviction and when the plea agreement includes no reference to it?

2. Does the offense of solicitation of possession of a dangerous drug constitute a previous conviction pursuant to § 13-901.01(F)?

We answer both questions in the affirmative. 1 In answering the first question, we follow Bolton v. Superior Court, 190 Ariz. 201, 945 P.2d 1332 (App.1997) and distinguish State v. Hensley, 201…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State of Arizona v. David Lee GreenArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. O'CONNOR v. HyattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API