Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Samaritan Health System

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 11, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 00-0386PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs in this class action appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Samaritan Health System and Banner Health Systems (the hospitals). The trial court found that the hospitals may validly enforce medical hens pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 33-931 (2000) against plaintiffs for the balance of the hospitals’ customary charges not paid by plaintiffs’ health insurers (insurers) pursuant to the provider contracts with the hospitals. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Plaintiffs 1 were all injured by the negligence of third-parties…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Blankenbaker v. JonovichArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Parnell v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lizer v. Eagle Air Med Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2004
  4. Samsel v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wainscott v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API