Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. City of Seward

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2007No. S-11628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

James Pruitt applied to the City of Seward for a permit to erect a new building in the city's industrial zone. Pruitt's building plan included a canopy over the building's front entrance. The city refused to grant permission to build the canopy, claiming that the canopy was an "attachment to a building" that would extend into the building setback mandated by Seward's zoning code. Pruitt did not appeal. After Pruitt erected his building, including the canopy, the city filed a superior court enforcement action and argued that Pruitt could not defend in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Manning v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Eberhart v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API