Pruitt v. City of Seward
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
James Pruitt applied to the City of Seward for a permit to erect a new building in the city's industrial zone. Pruitt's building plan included a canopy over the building's front entrance. The city refused to grant permission to build the canopy, claiming that the canopy was an "attachment to a building" that would extend into the building setback mandated by Seward's zoning code. Pruitt did not appeal. After Pruitt erected his building, including the canopy, the city filed a superior court enforcement action and argued that Pruitt could not defend in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Manning v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Eberhart v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014