Legal Opinion

Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and Appeals

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2014No. 6917 S-15034Published

1Opinion of the Court

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the P ACIFIC R EPORTER . Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@appellate.courts.state.ak.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA CLIFTON O. TWEEDY, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-15034 Appellant, ) ) Superior Court No. 3AN-12-04609 CI v. ) ) OPINION MATANUSKA-SUSITNA ) BOROUGH BOARD OF ) No. 6917 – June 20, 2014 ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS, ) ) Appellee. )…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API