Legal Opinion

Manning v. Alaska RR Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1993No. S-5185PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Terrance Manning appeals the superior court’s denial of his motion for partial sum mary judgment and its granting of the Alaska Railroad Corporation’s (ARRC) motion for summary judgment. In granting ARRC’s motion for summary judgment, the superior court agreed with ARRC that Manning’s civil suit was the equivalent of an administrative appeal of ARRC’s termination decision and therefore time barred under Appellate Rule 602(a)(2). In denying his motion, the superior court rejected Manning’s argument that the Department of Labor’s determination that he was entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. DeNardo v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. Lundgren Pacific Const. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Sondra Irving v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. State v. PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEES ASS'NAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Carlson v. RenkesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kilmer v. Dillingham City School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API