Ben Lomond, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
The case arises from the revocation of building permits for the renovation of the S & S Apartments in Anchorage. The building’s owner, Ben Lomond, Inc. (Ben Lo-mond), chose not to appeal the revocation or seek a variance. Ben Lomond claims that the Municipality unconstitutionally revoked its permits and, therefore, is liable in damages to Ben Lomond. The trial court denied Ben Lomond compensation reasoning that the Municipality of Anchorage (Municipality) was immune from an action for damages. We affirm the judgment on different grounds.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Native Village of Eyak v. GC ContractorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State, Department of Labor, Wage & Hour Division v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Nelson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Malecon Tobacco, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Standard Alaska Production Co. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.