Legal Opinion
South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. Coffey
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1993No. S-5197PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
The South Anchorage Concerned Coalition (SACC) appeals the superior court’s reversal of the Anchorage Planning and Zoning Commission’s (the Commission’s) decision to deny a conditional use permit to Dan Coffey and G.F. Kalmbach (Coffey). The superior court ruled that the findings supporting the permit denial were legally deficient and were not supported by substantial evidence. The court ordered the Commission to grant the permit. We reverse.
I. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS
The property involved in this appeal is a 58-acre parcel of land known as the Kalm-bach gravel pit. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Byrum v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Galt v. StantonAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lazy Mountain Land Club v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment & AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Native Village of Eklutna v. Board of Adjustment for the Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.