Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and Appeals
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Clifton Tweedy began leasing property from the Matanuska-Susitna Borough on Big Lake in May 1988. The property included a house that was built in 1968 and located less than 18 feet from the lakeshore. When Tweedy assumed the lease, the existing structure was exempt from the Borough's 75-foot shoreline setback ordinance because it was constructed before any setback requirement existed. Shortly after he took possession of the property, Tweedy constructed a stairwell addition on the exterior of the house. In 2010 Tweedy applied with the Borough…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- State, Office of Public Advocacy, Office of Elder Fraud & Assistance v. Estate of Jean R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Corkery v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BeardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019