McNulty v. New Richmond Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. R. H. Latimer, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the return of money paid under the terms of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property.
Adam Van Prooyen, a resident of Oregon, on the twenty-fifth day of November, 1912, entered into a contract with the New Richmond Land Company, the defendant, wherein he agreed to purchase, and the defendant to sell, two lots of land in the city of Richmond. The purchase price of the property, specified in the contract, was nine hundred dollars, the sum of fifty dollars to be paid on execution and delivery of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Krotzer v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Estate of WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Bishop v. BarndtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Bean Growers' Ass'n v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Rosenblum v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. Nevada Packard Mines Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1920
- Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- California Western Holding Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.