Bishop v. Barndt
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This, in form an action to quiet title, is, in effect, one to declare a forfeiture of the rights of all the defendants in and to the real property in question. The facts of the case appear from the findings, fully supported by the testimony.
By an agreement of sale, made on February 6, 1913, the plaintiff agreed to sell, and the defendant, Elizabeth J, Barndt, agreed to buy, the land in question for the sum of one thousand three hundred dollars, payable one hundred dollars upon the execution of the agreement, four hundred dollars on March 1, 1914, four hundred dollars on March 1, 1915, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- De Arguello v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Keele v. ClouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Boulenger v. MorisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. Nevada Packard Mines Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1920
- Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Kelso v. UlrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.