Krotzer v. Clark
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. Wiseman Macdonald, and Thomas A. Berkebile, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
After the trial the interest of Henry Krotzer, the original plaintiff, was assigned to Sidney Luther, who has been added as a respondent. We shall discuss the case as if Krotzer were the sole plaintiff.
On June 11, 1912, Krotzer made a written agreement for the sale of a parcel of land in Los Angeles County to the defendant, Clark, for four thousand one hundred dollars, of which fifty dollars was paid in cash, and the balance was to be paid in installments. One of the terms of the agreement was that the land was to be conveyed free and clear of all roads, easements, or encumbrances, “which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Peek v. SteinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Roche v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Estate of WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Spencer v. MaverickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.