Legal Opinion

Rosenblum v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1937No. 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Chief Justice.

On’ March 11, 1932, Clarence Rosenblum, of Cheyenne, Wyoming, made a so-called non-medical application .for a policy of $2000 on his life, to the Sun Life Assurance Company, hereafter referred to as the insurance company or as the defendant. The applicant was then 18 years of age; his beneficiary was his father, Jacob Rosenblum, plaintiff herein. The applicant, answering certain inquiries, stated that he was in good health, and agreed — a clause also substantially contained in the policy, that “said policy shall not take effect until the first premium has been paid during…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. FergusonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. American Central Life Ins. Co. v. AlexanderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Hennessy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  4. Redman v. Ætna InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Lee v. Prudential Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Alm v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. StamperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Jones v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API