Legal Opinion
Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. Parker
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1960No. Civ. 19083PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.
Action for breach of contract. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals. Appellant Parker had the general contract for the construction of the new Hall of Justice and Records Building at Redwood City; respondent (“Ruane”) had the subcontract with Parker for the plastering. Although the judgment is for $8,272.01, with interest, no claim of error is made as to $1,204.66 thereof. Error is claimed as to $5,400, representing the cost to Parker of painting exterior stucco, and as to $1,667.35, representing the cost to Parker of patching cracked interior plaster. Parker claims that an…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bencon Management & General Contracting, Inc. v. Boyer, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Delta Lines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 468California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Fresno Air Service v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.