Legal Opinion
Dick Fischer Development No. 2, Inc. v. Department of Administration
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1989No. S-2942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
Dick Fischer Development No. 2, Inc., brought this action against the State of Alaska after the cancellation of a large construction project. Arguing that a valid construction contract was formed and subsequently breached, Fischer sought lost profits and breach of contract damages. The state was awarded summary judgment and Fischer appeals. 1
The State of Alaska planned to consolidate state government offices in geographically central locations in various cities. (For a detailed factual background see generally McBirney & Associates v. State, 753 P.2d 1132, 1133 (Alaska…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Inman v. Clyde Hall Drilling CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. Zia, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- McBirney & Associates v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Hammond v. AllenAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dick Fischer Development No. 2, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jay Dee/Mole Joint Venture v. Mayor & City CouncilDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- State, Department of Administration v. Bachner Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Seneca Mineral Co. v. County of ChautauquaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Borgman v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USADistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022