Legal Opinion
McBirney & Associates v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1988No. S-1896PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This case arises out of a contract between the State of Alaska and McBirney & Associates (McBirney), a general partnership and building owner, to lease to the state office space in Fairbanks. The attorney general advised that the contract was void due to irregularities in the manner by which it was obtained by McBirney. McBirney sued to enforce the contract. The superior court granted the state’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
It was a policy goal of Governor William A. Sheffield’s administration to consolidate state offices…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Nkf Engineering, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Weidlinger Associates, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Dick Fischer Development No. 2, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Ruckle v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Aloha Lumber Corp. v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.