Legal Opinion
King v. Alaska State Housing Authority
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1981No. 5234, 5252PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This litigation has been before the Alaska court system for more than ten years. It is now on appeal to this court for the third time.
The facts pertinent to the present appeal are not in dispute. In 1964, the Alaska State Housing Authority (hereinafter “ASHA”) adopted, and the Anchorage City Council approved, an urban renewal plan for the Eastchester area of Anchorage. Pursuant to this plan, ASHA condemned the land on which the Eastchester project was to be built, part of which was owned by appellants King and Cherrier. One provision of the urban renewal plan…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Shields v. GerhartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Phillips v. Youth Development Program, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.