State, Department of Administration v. Bachner Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
We are asked to determine whether a Department of Administration hearing officer erred when he selected the remedy for a defective procurement process. - Several months after a procurement contract for a long term lease was awarded, the hearing officer concluded that three separate irregularities had occurred during the proposal evaluation process. After conducting an analysis under AS 86.30.585(b), the Alaska provision governing remedies for errors committed in the procurement process, the hearing officer awarded the aggrieved bidders their proposal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Delta Data Systems Corporation v. William H. Webster, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and System Development Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Dick Fischer Development No. 2, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- McBirney & Associates v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Gunderson v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bachner Company, Inc. v. WeedAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Weed v. BACHNER CO. INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Weed v. BACHNER CO. INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010