Seneca Mineral Co. v. County of Chautauqua
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The background of this case has been set forth previously in this court’s order of September 11, 1989. Item 21. At that time, the court denied defendants’ motions to dismiss and permitted discovery to proceed. Discovery is now complete. Plaintiff has stipulated to the withdrawal of its claims against all defendants except the County of Chautauqua. Items 29, 33, 37. Three causes of action against the county remain: (Count 1) breach of contract, (Count 4) wrongful retention of bid security, and (Count 5) construction costs and purchases. Plaintiff moves for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Le Cesse Bros. Contracting, Inc. v. Town Board of WilliamsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Le Cesse Bros. Contracting, Inc. v. Town Bd. of the Town of WilliamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Molloy v. . City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Allen v. EberlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Erving v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DEL VALLE GROUP v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010