Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hammond v. Allen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1981No. 5056PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

In this suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, appellant State of Alaska sought a judicial determination of the effects of a referendum repeal of Chapter 205, Session Laws of Alaska 1975. 1 That enactment, in addition to providing for substantial pay raises for members of the legislature and the judiciary, created a retirement system known during its short life as Elected Public Officers’ Retirement System (hereinafter EPORS). Ch. 205, §§ 1-4, 8, SLA 1975. The suit was opposed by B. B. Allen, Commissioner of Administration at the time the action was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Geller v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. GallionAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Duncan v. Retired Public Employees of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Legislative Council v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Dick Fischer Development No. 2, Inc. v. Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API