In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). The accused does not challenge that conclusion. The trial panel suspended the accused from the practice of law for 30 days but ordered that the suspension be stayed pending a probationary period of not more than 18 months during which the accused was required to complete a law school ethics course. The Oregon State Bar seeks this court’s de novo review of the recommended sanction under ORS 9.536 2 and Rules of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PenningtonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MagarOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Matter of CupplesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KeinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SpiesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.