Legal Opinion

Dyal v. Fire Companies Adjustment Bureau, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1945No. 29648PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This was an action, brought jointly by two sets of plaintiffs, to recover damages for personal injuries and property loss resulting from an automobile collision. The action was tried before the court without a jury. The court made findings of fact, drew conclusions of law, and entered judgment in separate specified amounts in favor of the respective sets of plaintiffs. Deeming themselves aggrieved by the alleged paucity of the amounts awarded to them, the plaintiffs appealed. The two plaintiffs who were immediately affected by the collision, Anne Dyal and Dorothy Crawford, will hereinafter be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barney v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Daigle v. RudebeckWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Norland v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Huntington v. Clallam Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rettinger v. BresnahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McKernan v. AasheimWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API