Legal Opinion

Norland v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1932No. 23809. Department TwoPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries, and was tried to the court and a jury. After a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $590, the plaintiff moved for a new trial, which motion was overruled and judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which he appeals.

The accident out of which the litigation arose happened January 1, 1931, at about seven o’clock p. m., in the city of Seattle, on or near what is known as the Montlake bridge. The appellant was proceeding south in a Forde coupe owned and driven by one Peter Sylte. A Plymouth sedan owned by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kelly v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Daigle v. RudebeckWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dorian v. Benj. E. Boone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Danielson v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. TatumWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Rettinger v. BresnahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Mathisen v. NortonWashington Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API