Legal Opinion

Burr v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1948No. 30354PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover compensation for damage done to their residential heating system, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants’ employee while making repairs to a part of the heating equipment. The action was tried to the court, without a jury. The trial court made findings of fact, stated its conclusions of law, and entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants appealed.

At the time involved in this action, respondents J. Walter Burr and Pearl V. Burr, husband and wife, were the owners of and occupied a six-room house situated in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berglund v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Machine Co. v. Compress Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ullrich v. Columbia & CowLitz Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Stenger v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sutton v. ShufelbergerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API