Legal Opinion

McKernan v. Aasheim

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1984No. 50157-2PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

Where a healthy, normal child is born after an unsuccessful sterilization operation, may the parents recover damages in a tort action for the cost of rearing and educating that unplanned child? The trial court held in a partial summary judgment that child-rearing costs could not be recovered. We affirm.

I

On March 7, 1980, Dr. Glen Aasheim performed a sterilization operation known as a tubal ligation upon Karen McKernan. Despite the operation, Karen became pregnant and gave birth to a healthy, normal child. In February 1983, Karen and her husband James McKernan filed the present lawsuit,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Soto Cabral v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  4. James G. v. CasertaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Johnson v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API