Legal Opinion

Rettinger v. Bresnahan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1953No. 32246PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The jury returned a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action.

Appellant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury for the reason that there was neither evidence nor reasonable inference from the evidence to justify the verdict.

In Omeitt v. Department of Labor & Industries, 21 Wn. (2d) 684, 152 P. (2d) 973, we said:

“It is the firmly established rule that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict involves no element of discretion and will not be granted unless the court can say, as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ericksen v. Edmonds School District No. 15Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bates v. TirkWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Norland v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dyal v. Fire Companies Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Arnold v. SanstolWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Nelson v. MartinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API