Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Eneroth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1934No. 24759. En BancPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

This action, instituted by John C. Thornton and wife and tried to the court and jury, is for damages resulting from personal injuries received by Thornton in two distinct, but nevertheless closely related, automobile accidents. Challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence and motion for nonsuit, made at the conclusion of respondents’ case, were denied. After the introduction of all the evidence, each of appellants renewed these challenges and motions, and in the alternative asked for a directed verdict, all of which were denied. The jury returned a verdict for three thousand…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Keller v. BrenemanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Young v. DilleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Eskildsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chadwick v. EkWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Caylor v. B. C. Motor Transportation, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Litts v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Hanson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API