Legal Opinion

Notkin v. Notkin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1996No. S-7182PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Joseph Notkin appeals, contending that the superior court erred both in setting aside the Notions’ original property settlement agreement and in its resolution of property and support issues. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Nitaya Notkin and Joseph Notkin were married in 1984. Joseph works as an architect and earns approximately $56,000 a year. Nitaya works as a hair stylist with an anticipated future earning capacity of approximately $13,200 a year; she is also raising and supporting a son from a prior relationship. At the time of their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Richmond v. RichmondAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Zimin v. ZiminAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tybus v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Gallant v. GallantAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McDougall v. LumpkinAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ford v. FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API