McDougall v. Lumpkin
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Avis McDougall appeals from rulings entered when she and Lindsay Lumpkin divoreed. We vacate the property division and remand because it was both inequitable and based on clearly erroneous findings. We also vacate the alimony award and remand because of conflicts between that award and the property division, and because of unexplained contradictions between the superior court's oral and written findings. We affirm the award of joint legal custody because the superior court did not abuse its discretion in dealing with the custody issue.
II. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Hunt v. HuntAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Sheridan v. SheridanAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Wick Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Veselsky v. VeselskyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Hooper v. HooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Ogden v. OgdenAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.