Legal Opinion

Zimin v. Zimin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1992No. S-4425, S-4443PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

In this divorce proceeding, Ralph Zimin challenges two aspects of the trial court’s division of marital property. He first argues that equitable division is inappropriate in this case because the parties were only married for 32 months. Alternatively, he claims that the court erred in valuing the property available for distribution. He also appeals the court’s custody and child support awards. Martha Zimin cross-appeals, arguing that the court erred in denying her request for attorney’s fees and costs. We find no fault in the trial court’s handling of all these issues…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Evans v. EvansAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Money v. MoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API