Legal Opinion

Tybus v. Holland

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1999No. S-8559, S-8560PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Donald Tybus and Catherine Holland appeal various aspects of the superior court’s property division and alimony award. Because the superior 'court acted within its discretion when it set the date of separation, classified Catherine’s student loans as marital, distributed the marital estate unequally, distributed pensions through the use of Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs), awarded a judgment lien to Catherine to ensure that Donald would pay marital debts, awarded rehabilitative alimony to Catherine, and ordered each party to pay his or her own…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cartee v. CarteeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hooper v. HooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Williams v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. McDougall v. LumpkinAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API