Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. Lind
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
After extensive litigation the parties to this case entered into a settlement, pursuant to which a consent decree was entered. The question now presented on appeal is whether the superior court erred in denying appellants an award of attorneys’ fee as prevailing parties.
In 1972, a civil action was initiated by Alaska Native children of secondary school age to compel the provision of secondary schools in their communities of residence. Their claims alleged violation of the Alaska *875Constitution, Art. VII, § 1 for failure to provide the schools, as well as equal protection…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dorothy P. Robinson v. Lorillard Corporation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.