Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Dodson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1998No. S-7386, S-7416PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The issues in this appeal and cross-appeal relate to proceedings that ended Jim and Robin Dodson’s marriage. Jim challenges several aspects of the superior court’s property division as well as the superior court’s decisions ordering him to sign a stock pledge agreement and to pay Robin reorientation alimony and attorney’s fees. In her cross-appeal, Robin argues that the superior court erred in characterizing certain property as marital rather than as belonging to her separately. We reverse in part, remand in part, and affirm in part.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API