Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Richmond

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1989No. S-2209PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal is from the property division, alimony, child support, and attorney fees and costs judgment , in a domestic proceeding between Robert and Margaret. Robert asserts that the professional goodwill of an attorney is unmarketable and hence the trial court erred by including his professional goodwill in the marital estate. He also contends that the trial court erred by accepting an improper value for his law firm’s tangible assets, awarding Margaret $3,000 per month alimony for six years, $1,000 per month per child for child support, and approximately $80,000 in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schanck v. SchanckAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hunt v. HuntAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zimin v. ZiminAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Nelson v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API