Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 9, 1952No. 4-9852PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
This is a taxpayers suit, attacking the constitutionality of certain provisions of Act 212 of 1945, which Act is sometimes called the “Urban Redevelopment Law,” or the “Blighted Area Law.” The Act 212 gives to any Housing Authority (established under Act 298 of 1937 and/or amendatory acts) additional powers as regards socalled “blighted” areas.
STATEMENT.
In his complaint, appellant alleged that he was a citizen and taxpayer of Little Rock; that the Housing Authority of Little Rock was attempting to act in this case under said Act 212 of 1945 and previous Acts; that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Matter of Murray v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, Gratiot, De Quindre and Mullett StreetsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues v. FarrarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.