In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, Gratiot, De Quindre and Mullett Streets
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtReid, C. J.
The petition in this matter was filed to institute condemnation proceedings to take private property for the public use or benefit, for the purpose of eliminating housing conditions detrimental to the public peace, health, safety, morals and welfare, and to aid in replanning and reconstruction of the area involved, in accordance with PA 1937, No 293, as amended (CL 1948, § 125.601 et seq. [Stat Ann 1949 Rev •§ 5.3057(1) et seq.), PA 1933 (Ex Sess), No 18, as amended (CL 1948, § 125.651 et seq. [Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.3011 et seq.]), with the provisions of ordinance 262-C, and title 8, chapter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Zurn v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Tuohy v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- Board of Health v. Van HoesenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Nashville Housing Authority v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.