Legal Opinion
McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues v. Farrar
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 27, 1939No. 4-5825PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This action was instituted in the Pulaski chancery court by H. E. Farrar, appellee, a retail liquor dealer. He alleges this suit is brought on behalf of himself and all others interested in the enforcement of the illegal exactions mentioned in this complaint. He alleged that act 310 of the Acts of 1939 is unconstitutional. This suit is against Z. M. McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues for the State of Arkansas, and wholesale liquor dealers.
A. A. Haynie filed an intervention on behalf of himself and other consumers of liquor who might be interested in enforcement of the illegal exactions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caldarera v. McCarroll, Commr. of Rev.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Rigsby v. Ruraldale Consolidated School District No. 64Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Matthews v. Bailey, GovernorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Bell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Treadwell v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Chandler v. Board of Trustees of the Teacher Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Parker v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Rowe v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.